PhD Graduates, Candidates and Students

⟶ PhD Graduates

Dr. BRYNNE CAMPBELL PhD 2022

 

Brynne Campbell is the marketing director of a medium-sized architecture firm. Passionate about architectural storytelling through text and images, she strives to find innovative ways to help architects showcase their work and communicate their unique value. 

 

Campbell has presented papers on marketing in architecture and the architect’s image. She was the co-organizer of POP // CAN // CRIT (Popular Topics, Canadian Context, Critical Questions). The national architecture symposium, which took place between 2016 and 2019, served as a resource, educational tool, and opportunity to share experiences and ideas related to architecture. POP // CAN // CRIT focused on contemporary topics for the profession within a Canadian context. 

 

Architecture Firm Marketing in Canada

 

Architects and scholars have suggested that the architecture profession is confused about what they do, and has trouble communicating the architect’s role and value to society. This issue is explored within the Canadian context through the ‘project of architecture’ – POP // CAN // CRIT 2017: Marketing and Communication of Architecture which took place on October 27, 2017 in Toronto, Canada. This symposium brought together professionals in the architecture industry to discuss the perceived role of marketing. It sought to open up the conversation on marketing for the Canadian architecture profession and serves as a resource for the dissertation research.

 

Building on this event, the dissertation employs a discourse analysis approach to the books, professional journals and documents written for and by architects, between 1955 – 2015, with the aim to see how the Canadian architecture profession’s relationship with business and marketing evolved. Emphasis is placed on Canadian Architect as the overarching voice of the profession in Canada since its establishment in 1955. Finally, through case studies, this dissertation looks at how marketing may contribute to architectural practice and whether marketing is embedded in architectural firms’ philosophies and strategic planning.

 

Supervisor: Dr. Federica Goffi, Professor, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Michel Rod, Dean of Business, University of New Brunswick
Advisor: Stephen Fai, Professor, Director CIMS, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU

Dr. JESSE RAFEIRO PhD 2021

 

JESSE RAFEIRO graduated from the PhD in Architecture at the Azrieli School of Architecture and Urbanism in October 2021. His dissertation “Fiction as Pedagogy: Toward a De-Anthropocentric Architectural Education” investigates fiction as a form of architectural pedagogy within the context of the Anthropocene. His research interests explore anthropocentric critiques found across fields such as philosophy, education theory, anthropology, biology and literature studies. Focusing on the intersection of emerging discourses in posthumanist education studies and nonhuman narratology his dissertation aims to promote critical approaches to education that situate nonhuman design and representation as trajectories for architectural thinking. Jesse has a research background in digital tools developed working between Carleton Immersive Media Studio (Carleton University), Facility for Architectural Research in Media and Mediation (McGill University) and Instituto Superior Técnico Lisboa (Universidade de Lisboa) where he has collaborated in a range of research projects and publications related to the documentation, visualization and dissemination of architectural heritage.

 

Fiction as Pedagogy: Toward a De-Anthropocentric Architectural Education

 

Critiquing the anthropocentric dispositions of architectural education, the dissertation introduces a “de-anthropocentric” vector of ethical thinking through fiction as a form of pedagogy. The term de-anthropocentric as opposed to non-anthropocentric here posits the nonhuman animal as an important dimension of architectural consideration while acknowledging the limit to understanding or advocating on behalf of the nonhuman other. By problematizing anthropocentrism in this way, the research participates in concurrent discourses in philosophy, education theory, anthropology, biology and literature studies that challenge the inherited biases of Western ontology and epistemology. Recognizing the predominance of education in structuring these biases, the research takes inspiration from experimental approaches in posthuman education studies that historically situate and reorient definitions of the human and disciplinarity in an age of extra-human responsibility. Toward this, the dissertation investigates three trajectories in literature studies as departure points: the weird realism of H.P. Lovecraft, the multispecies worlding of Haraway and the graphic portrayal of animal subjectivity in Herman’s narratology beyond the human. From these examples, the dissertation theorizes nonhuman narrative, representation and worldbuilding approaches in an architectural context. Finally, locating the early Renaissance as a period of major educational transition in architecture, the research analyzes Filarete’s Libro architettonico (1461-63) as a model of fiction-based pedagogy in the present. Written as a continuous fictional dialogue disrupted by digressions into the natural environment, animals, anecdotes, fictional buildings and social practises, the work offers a multifaceted educational model appropriate for questioning human-nonhuman relations in the present. Between text and image, the work instructs by imagining the ideal city of Sforzinda through the narrative device of the golden book: a source of ancient literary wisdom. Following an analysis of Filarete, the dissertation presents a re-interpretation of Filarete’s golden book as a pedagogical device to channel critical insight from literature and other disciplines into architectural education.

 

Supervisor: Dr. Stephen Fai, Professor, Director CIMS, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Claudio Sgarbi, Adjunct Professor, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Michael Jemtrud, Professor, The Peter Guo-hua Fu School of Architecture, McGill

Dr. JORGE RIVERA GUTIERREZ PhD 2021

 

JORGE RIVERA GUTIERREZ is an Ontario Trillium Scholar, PhD Graduate and architect working both in the design-build and videography fields. He began his doctoral studies in 2016 at the Azrieli School of Architecture and Urbanism at Carleton University. In 2007, he graduated from the Architectural History and Theory master’s program at McGill. His Guadalajara-based office, Departamento de Arquitectura, has been primarily invested in developing a design-build practice in collaboration with local craftspeople. He has also ventured along his brothers in making short films, video documents and video installations. His first video installation debuted at the 2016 Venice Biennale of Architecture, within the Mexican pavilion. Interested in the intersection of narrative, memory, time, and architecture. His research focuses in exploring the capacity of film to convey the experience of place, and in turn as means to inform architectural thought and imagination.

 

The Affective Threshold; or, The Sensational Account of Place Through Film

 

Most human stories must take place somewhere, architecture is rarely absent in film.⁠ Architectural environments serve essential roles in the unfolding of emotions and the experience of place in cinema. Conversely, cinema unravels the affective qualities of architecture. This dissertation is concerned with how filmmaking uses architectural atmospheres to frame a story and allow its characters to unfold fully in these emotional spaces, asking what is there to learn for architects from the portrayal of architecture as a stage for fiction. My research deploys film hermeneutics, atmosphere theory and phenomenology to propose that film is not only a visual medium but a conveyor of rich, haptic experiences, and as such it bears the capacity to speak to us about the poetic, emotional, and experiential richness of place and architectural atmospheres. To this end, I focus on two key elements to support this argument. First, a specific style of filmmaking: the school of slow cinema and the cinematic long-take,⁠ as a way of engaging our emotions into the spatial experiences that film can offer. Second, the house as a location, mainly as a place for grief and thus, emotional reconstitution. By bringing these two elements together, the thesis sheds light into the affective entanglement we form with our houses, and the capacity of cinema of enriching critical architectural discourse about the places we dwell in our every-day lives.

 

Supervisor: Dr. Federica Goffi, Professor, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Stephen Fai, Professor, Director CIMS, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Alberto Perez-Gomez, Saidye Rosner Bronfman Professor, The Peter Guo-hua Fu School of Architecture, McGill
Advisor: Marc Furstenau, Associate Professor, Film Studies Program Director, Carleton University

Dr. PALLAVI SWARANJALI PhD 2021

 

PALLAVI SWARANJALI is a full-time faculty in the Bachelor of Interior Design Program, Algonquin College, Ottawa  and a  PhD Graduate of the Azrieli School of Architecture and Urbanism, Carleton University, Ottawa. She has a B.A. in Architecture and an M.Design in Industrial Design from India, where she also worked in architectural practice. She is presently an intern architect with the Ontario Association of Architects, Canada. Her research centers on the relationship between architecture and storytelling, looking at non-conventional modes of architectural representation that combine the normative and the fantastical, and the ways in which they transform architectural making and experience. Her areas of teaching include residential and corporate studio, senior project, foundations of design as well as the history and theory of design. She is a coordinator of Carleton Research | Practice of Teaching | Collaborative (criptic.org) and one of the founder members of Canadian Centre for Mindful Habitats (mindfulhabitats.ca).

 

The Subjunctive Pause

 

The Dissertation titled “the Subjunctive Pause,” takes a critical look at architectural storytelling that imparted a polysemic and contronymic nature to architecture and its representation in the works of Indian architect, Balkrishna Doshi (b.1927). The dissertation studied three modes of architectural storytelling that Doshi adopted, namely, tectonic (through his buildings), visual (through his miniature painting style illustrations), and literary (through his written stories). His non-conventional ways of storytelling disregarded the notion of architectural creation and representation as a formulaic and precise visual image and explored the possibility of converting them into instruments of imaginative dreaming for making, inhabiting, and conversing in architecture. Doshi’s built work and its representation, created a “pause”- bringing in a reorientation to present the invisible by offering a poetic and syncretic virtual world. This “pause” solicited engagement. It was a clever contraption to engage in an imaginative understanding, conceptualization, inhabitation, making, and reading of built work and its representation, inculcating novel points of view to engage in a broad and deep architectural discourse. This dissertation argues that the “pause” was a quality of architectural conceptualization, experience, and representation that imparted to his architecture a subjunctive character that opened a space of translation between the author (architect) and the reader (users and others who are involved in the architectural creation) to foster an imaginative assimilation of architectural activities, in which they viewed architectural creation not only through a positivistic lens, but allowed the imaginative, oneiric, and fantastical to contribute. For Doshi, architectural creation assumed the form of a verb–the act of dreaming collectively a numinous architecture, rather than a substantive–the architecture of production that celebrated the singularity of the architect or the building as a seductive and commercialized image ignoring what he considered the basic tenet of architecture, which is its ability to promote a joyful and virtuous human life. The subjunctive act of dreaming that Doshi demonstrated and induced for others to practice created a contronymic condition through storytelling, by evoking the latent presence of a virtuality, the particularity of which was its ability to make architecture and its representation become analogous, vying for each other’s status and qualities.

 

Supervisor: Dr. Federica Goffi, Professor, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Stephen Fai, Professor, Director CIMS, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Joy Sen, Professor, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India

Dr. DAVIDE MEZZINO PhD 2017


Cultural Built Heritage’s Tangible and Intangible Dimensions and Digitalization Challenges


This research is based on the ongoing debate on the strengths and challenges brought about by the so-called ‘digital revolution’ in the field of the conservation of Cultural Built Heritage. Within this framework, this study analyzes how the dynamic relationship between tangible and intangible heritage strongly affects the understanding of a site as cultural heritage. This relationship influences the conservation actions adopted by conservators and decision makers and shapes the values that drive, and impact on, conservation choices.
The complex relationships between tangible and intangible dimensions of cultural heritage have been, until recently, surprisingly underestimated in scientific research. A possible explanation lies in the limited amount of multidimensional and interdisciplinary approaches applied by scholars of different disciplines, often interested in sectorial analysis of either the tangible or the intangible dimensions of cultural built heritage. The research moves in the direction of integrating such dimensions through a comprehensive approach. The project aims at demonstrating that an understanding of the role of intangible dimensions of built heritage can orient the conservation process, moving towards a more inclusive approach based on the respect for different context-based perspectives and interpretations of the cultural dimensions of heritage conservation, preservation and restoration.
The research hypothesis is that digital documentation workflows have a strong potential for integrating different sources of information, based on both qualitative and quantitative analysis, by processing and integrating knowledge about tangible and intangible dimensions of built heritage. The research proposes an enhanced approach, called WikiBIM, which builds on a combination of rapid ethnographic appraisal methods and IT- supported techniques for data acquisition, processing and management.
The research approach is tested on the concrete case of the Loka-hteik-pan temple in Bagan, Myanmar. Conclusions about the effectiveness of the approach highlight the importance of integrating local knowledge, sometimes transmitted only through oral means, in mainstream digital design tools, such as Building Information Modelling (BIM), in order to improve the social, cultural and environmental sustainability of built heritage conservation.

Supervisor: Dr. Mario Santana Quintero, Professor, Architectural Conservation and Sustainability Engineering, CU
Co-Supervisor: Dr. Fulvio Rinaudo, Full Professor, Dipartimento di Architettura e Design, Politecnico di Torino
Co-Supervisor: Dr. Carla Bartolozzi, Full Professor, Dipartimento di Architettura e Design, Politecnico di Torino
Advisor: Dr. Manuela Mattone, Associate Professor, Dipartimento di Architettura e Design, Politecnico di Torino
Advisor: Dr. Grazia Tucci, Associate Professor, Ingegneria Civile E Ambientale (Dicea), Università degli studi di Firenze
Advisor: Dr. Stephen Fai, Professor, Director CIMS, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU

⟶ PhD Candidates

RANA ABUGHANNAM is a PhD candidate at Carleton University’s School of Architecture and Urbanism in 2017. She obtained her professional degree in Architectural Engineering from Birzeit University in 2012 and was granted her post-professional Master’s of Architecture degree from the History and Theory Program at McGill University’s School of Architecture in 2013. Rana is a Registered Architect in both Palestine and Jordan, where she practiced as a freelance architect. She is co-founder and a coordinator of CR|PT|C (Carleton Research | Practice of Teaching | Collaborative) which pursues research in the humanities with a diverse research agenda that reflects the interests of the collaborators through the Practice of Teaching in academic settings in architecture. Rana is currently teaching Morphology of the City at Carleton University. Prior to joining Carleton, Rana taught at the School of Architecture and Interior Design at the Canadian University Dubai and at the Department of Architecture at Birzeit University. Her research interests revolve around architecture and urbanity and the socio-political conditions that govern them. Her doctoral dissertation builds on her previous research and focuses on spatial forms of colonialism and resistance in Palestine.

 

Counter-colonial: probing spatial forms of resistance in Hebron, Palestine

 

The old city of Hebron, Palestine presents the extreme condition of a militarized space where historic and religiously significant built heritage is overlapped by devices of colonization including checkpoints, watchtowers, and barricades. Given that today’s non-sovereign quasi-state Palestine is not fully divested of its colonial hegemonies, I propose that actions of Palestinian resistance that challenge the colonial project are deemed as counter-colonial tactics. These tactics—rather than decolonial actions—are an active response to an ongoing colonial project and aim to reclaim the space colonized by readapting it and reinforcing indigenous existence. In the old city of Hebron, built heritage has become the locus where counter-colonial tactics are activated. Once a vibrant urban centre, the old city’s core has become a ghost town of militarized spaces, restricted movement, and embedded fear. Hebronites have responded with spatial counter-colonial tactics, such as transforming the function of existing buildings, reorienting the entrances of homes, and promoting public events and protests to undermine the colonial project of spatial and social control.
The doctoral research investigates the socio-spatial implications of the colonization of Hebron and probes counter-colonial tactics adopted within the built heritage of the city as a strategy to restore the old city. The research proposes a bottom-up understanding of the site while promoting spatial research as investigative probing rather than problem-solving. It analyzes the old city’s urban formation as a product of two different spatial schemes. The first is a colonial project of spatial governance using military structures such as roads, checkpoints, and blockades which seek to restrict the dynamic psycho-geographical terrains. The second is an attempt to counter those colonial measures through tactics produced within the built heritage and its shifting landscape. Ultimately, my research employs counter-methodologies that offer alternatives to the typical methods adopted in research on architecture under conflict; and sheds light on the counter-colonial tactics in the old city of Hebron as active modes of resistance in response to the spatial forms of colonialism imposed on the city.

 

Supervisor: Dr. Ozayr Saloojee, Associate Professor, MArch Chair, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Federica Goffi, Professor, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Roger Connah, Associate Professor, MArch Chair, ASAU, CU

NICOLAS ARELLANO RISOPATRON is a Ph.D. candidate at Carleton University focusing on coding and digital models and their impact on architecture. He is currently a research team lead at the Carleton Immersive Media Studio (CIMS). In addition, he teaches BIM Fundamentals at Algonquin College and is the director of research of the Digital Building National Capital Region (dbNCR), a group dedicated to build and facilitate connections among AECO professionals. He worked at NORR Limited where he learned how to write scripts that allowed him to automate several solutions to repetitive production problems using algorithms and visual programming tools. He holds a Bachelor (2014) in Architecture from Universidad Catolica of Chile (UC) specialized in “Systems and Technologies” and certified in “Developing BIM Projects”. At UC he was Adjunct Instructor of “Building Techniques and Construction” and worked in the UC Timber Innovation Centre, which studies the benefits of wood for construction.

 

De-black boxing BIM
How could architects utilize BIM outside of proprietary software and closed file formats and why?

This dissertation talks about the use of computer coding in the field of architectural representation. It analyses the different ways in which coding can impact architecture. Since the 1970s, when computers became available to architects, this new human-computer relationship became a challenge for architecture in multiple fundamental aspects, such as representation, education, and practice. Half a century later, in the 2020s, computers are not only available to architects, but in most cases, they are indispensable. The term black box, to describe opaque computer processes has been used since the early 1940s. It has its origins in electronic circuits to describe a system that can be understood only in terms of its inputs and outputs but which process is not accessible or even visible to users. This dissertation introduces the terminology of ‘de-black box’ as a process that leads to understanding the process, parts, and connection of a system. The historian Antoine Picon states that “it has become unavoidable to enter into the black box of programming in order to make a truly creative use of the computer” (Picon 2006). There are several digital processes of architectural representation; one of the most popular today is Building Information Modeling (BIM). In the last two decades, BIM has become not only a possibility, but it is also mandated by governments in many countries. For this reason, I argue that it is imperative to understand both its potential and limitations. Chuck Eastman, one of the fathers of BIM explains in his BIM Handbook that “BIM is not a thing or a type of software but a human activity that ultimately involves broad process changes in construction”(Eastman 2018). Digital objects are coded to describe and represent real-life building components. This facilitates a dialog with the digital model that was previously not possible. BIM could be defined as a communication and collaboration tool originally created to connect people, processes, and data. However, that is not exactly the way the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry is using BIM. The status quo is to work with proprietary solutions and closed file formats. The issue is that when working with closed formats, an important part of the design and production process becomes a black box. The author states that two conditions must be met before architects can fully de-black box the digital toolbox. First, the source code—or list of human-readable instructions that define a computer program—of the software used by architects must be open and accessible for examination and modification. Secondly, architects must deeply understand the software they use, which means that they must have a working knowledge of computer programming. This research warns about the obstacles that architects must overcome in order to benefit from a fruitful relationship between software and architecture, putting the goal of designing better buildings for people at the core. Computers offer a tremendous contribution to our architectural exploration if we continue to explore innovative research that includes human input with computer logic and processing power to arrive at collaborative solutions.

 

Supervisor: Dr. Stephen Fai, Professor, Director CIMS, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Federica Goffi, Professor, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Azam Kahn, Adjunct Professor of Computer Science, University of Toronto

ÉMÉLIE DESROCHERS-TURGEON is a designer and researcher whose work explores the intersections of architectural representation, spatial justice, and landscape through the mediums of drawing, publication, exhibition and education. Her research interests broadly include the relationship between built environments and ecologies, with a particular emphasis on settler colonial building practices.She holds a professional Master’s degree in Architecture from McGill University and a bachelor’s degree in Environmental Design from Université du Québec à Montréal. She practiced design in Montreal and Berlin, where she gained experience in low-income housing and exhibition design. Her doctoral research, funded by the Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship, considers the scale, the material assemblages, and the political aesthetic of the Central Experimental Farm and Museum of Nature in Ottawa as infrastructures of settler colonization.

 

Building the Dominion’s Grounds: Surveying, Ordering, Experimenting, and Displaying Soil in 1856–1939 Ottawa 

The dissertation examines the institutions of the Central Experimental Farm and the Canadian Museum of Nature in Ottawa during the 1856–1939 period. Employing posthumanist and settler colonial theory, the project builds upon archival documentation, fieldwork and drawing practices to probe the manifold encounters between built environments and ground. The ground as a noun and as a verb are conversely considered in terms of material, social and relational practices present in the centralized planning of the Dominion of Canada. The Canadian Museum of Nature, founded and operated by the Geological Survey of Canada, is analyzed by looking at practices of construction and display of geographic knowledge. Conversely, the Central Experimental Farm is examined, in particular its orchestration of surveying (with the Geodetic Survey of Canada), property tracing, soil research and experimentation. Studying and destabilizing the concepts of “Dominion” (Latin dominus, as lord, master) and “house” (Latin domus), the dissertation explores how these negotiations with the ground illustrate unstable, paradoxical, and ambivalent spatial relationships complicit in settler colonial processes. Finally, the research also illuminates how those institutions and practices have been resisted, refused, and disrupted. 

 

Supervisor: Dr. Federica Goffi, Professor, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU 
Advisor: Dr. Catherine Bonier, Assistant Professor, ASAU, CU 
Advisor: Dr. Zoe Todd, Associate Professor, Department of Sociology and Anthropology CU 

JENAN GHAZAL is a PhD candidate at the Azrieli School of Architecture & Urbanism, involved in historical and contemporary entanglements of architecture, political violence, and the body in urban spaces. She has a BA (2012) and an MA (2014) from the Académie des Beaux-Arts in Lebanon, where she also has professional experience as a licensed architect. Before obtaining a Master of Architectural Studies from Carleton University (2016), Jenan was actively involved with community-based activism and documentation of endangered heritage buildings in her hometown Tripoli, Lebanon. Living in a city in conflict, she has experienced first-hand the destruction inflicted both on and by the built environment while she was in her undergraduate studies in architecture. Inspired by this journey, her doctoral research aims to destabilize traditional assumptions about the dynamics between political violence and architecture in Lebanon. Considering spatial violence as a political (and architectural) practice of oppressing states, she looks at Beirut’s specific urban spaces where citizens experienced physical and non-physical violence brought by their immediate built environment. Her work aims to contribute to an understanding of spatial violence in architecture –not as a state of exception but as continuous immanence. She is currently a SSHRC scholar (2020) and is affiliated with the Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations at the University of Toronto.

Locating spatial violence in Beirut: the line, the wall and the tower

This is a research project on spatial violence as a political practice. There is a political practice ‎of reciprocal interaction between walls, lines, demarcations, buildings and living human ‎bodies. This reciprocal interaction is the realm where spatial violence exists. Investigating ‎various phases of the conflict in Beirut’s history, I explore the implications of wall building ‎and their spatial and socio-political dimensions through ‎the emergence of both physical and ‎virtual urban partitions. The “demarcation” line, the tower of “bitterness,” and the wall of ‎‎“shame,” are connotations for three ‎spaces bounded to a history of violence in Beirut, Lebanon. ‎The ways in which Beirut’s panoptical towers were appropriated during the war in accordance ‎with their location from the demarcation line, resonate with the systemic practice of governing ‎by disruption of the urban fabric. Walls and security barriers present today in Beirut pertain to ‎a history of “spatial” violence ‎where architecture exercises aggression against the ‎human body.‎ ‎ This research does not assume architecture as a target of destruction, ‎nor merely ‎as a military weapon. Spatial violence is not a state of exception, but one of continuous immanence in ‎the architecture of our cities. ‎

Supervisor: Ozayr Saloojee, Associate Professor, MArch Chair, ASAU, CU 
Co-supervisor: Claudio Sgarbi, Adjunct Professor, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Jerzy Elzanowski, Assistant Professor, Canadian and Indigenous Studies, CU

KATIE GRAHAM received her BAS (2008) and M.ARCH (2010) in architecture at the ASAU at CU. She is currently completing her Ph.D. in Architecture with a focus on the relationship between architecture and virtual reality storytelling, focusing on how the emerging medium introduces new narrative possibilities.

 

Prior to her appointment as Instructor in the Bachelor of Media Production and Design, Katie was actively involved for a decade with Carleton Immersive Media Studio (CIMS), a research lab affiliated with the School of Architecture whose focus is on how advanced digital technologies and hybrid forms of representation can reveal the invisible aspects of architecture. While at CIMS, she led multiple digitally assisted storytelling projects that use CIMS’ digital assets such as panoramas, models, and point cloud data to create public outreach projects for the web, mobile and virtual reality. Such projects include the Senate Virtual Tour – a web application that uses panoramas, photographs, and photogrammetry to teach of the Senate of Canada’s architectural home; and the VR Kiosk – five passive virtual reality stories focusing on the rehabilitation project of the Canadian Parliament Buildings.

 

Katie has taught as a contract instructor at both Carleton University for the Azrieli School of Architecture and Urbanism and Algonquin College in the Bachelor of Building Science Program. She has a passion for learning, research, and new technology that she brings to the classroom setting.

 

Supervisor: Dr. Stephen Fai, Professor, Director CIMS, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Federica Goffi, Professor, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Michael Jemtrud, Professor, The Peter Guo-hua Fu School of Architecture, McGill

KEN PERCY is a PhD Candidate of the PhD program in Architecture at Carleton University. His research interests examine the tension between the fields of architectural representation and digital fabrication. While developing his dissertation Ken has been working at the Carleton Immersive Media Studio (CIMS) where he has been leading projects on digital documentation as well as establishing the new CNC fabrication lab at the school of architecture. Highlights of his projects include digital documentation of the Kasbah of Taourirt in Morocco, photogrammetric recording of historic wall paintings in a church in the Peruvian Andes, and laser scanning and surveying the Parliament Buildings in Ottawa for rehabilitation. Further, in collaboration with public works, Ken has been developing a protocol for digitally milling the new doors for the Senate after relocation to the Government Conference Centre on Rideau Street.


Dissertation Abstract

 

The development and widespread adoption of Computer Numerically Controlled (CNC) technology has both challenged and animated the practice and study of architecture. Developing in tandem with the hardware, Computer Aided Design (CAD) software has fundamentally challenged the field of architectural representation. On the surface CAD software appears to produce digital versions of hand drawn plans, sections, and elevations but there are a number of key differences beyond the physical construction of the drawing tools. There are technical aspects of the CAD drawing which allow the lines drawn to be assigned as tool paths in CNC software that directly control the direction and physical movement of CNC tools. Related to this both physically and philosophically there is a representation of time in the layers of an architect’s traces that are lost in digital layers of CAD software but re-emerge in the software that controls the tool paths. For these reasons I hypothesize that digital tool paths made from digital drawing and modeling software represent a new mode of architectural representation. While the new technologies displace established architectural mediums, certain historical precedents allow us to examine the nature of the changes that arise from the displacement and offer us insight into our present condition. The first treatise of the 16th century French architect Philibert Delorme (1514-1570) illustrates both personal and professional experience with the changing modes of design representation at a time of professional upheaval in Europe. Beginning with Delorme, this study is divided into three parts. First, a close reading and original translation of Book I of his treatise Nouvelles inventions pour bien bastir et a petit fraiz provides us with context for the study of new and emerging digital tools for representation in architecture. Second, a theory is developed around the analogous connection that exists between the work of Delorme and contemporary CNC related tools of representation. Finally, employing CNC machines and the new mode of representation I will develop a series of projects that demonstrate through juxtaposition the nature of the new mode of architectural representation.

 

Supervisor: Dr. Stephen Fai, Professor, Director CIMS, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Federica Goffi, Professor, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Simone Garagnani, Professor, Architecture School, University of Bologna, Italy

ISABEL POTWOROWSKI is a PhD Candidate at Carleton University’s ASAU since 2020. She completed her Bachelor’s in Architecture at McGill University (2011), her professional Master’s in Architecture at TU Delft (2015) and obtained a Master’s in Architectural History + Theory at McGill (2020). In the Netherlands, she worked at Barcode Architects, the International New Town Institute, and Mecanoo Architecten. She has also been a contributing editor for the international architecture magazine C3 since 2015. Her research interests revolve around architecture’s capacity to foster well-being and communicate meaning through atmosphere and aesthetic experience.

 

Mediators of Transcendence: Examining the role of Atelier Zumthor’s representation practices in the design of architecture capable of mediating an experience of transcendence

 

Atelier Zumthor’s buildings have been variously described by critics and scholars as having “atmosphere,” a “sense of presence,” “evoking mystery,” fostering experiences of the “spiritual”, of “transcendence,” even of the “sacred,” and “lead[ing] towards the holy”. The present research aims to investigate how architecture that fosters such experiences is designed, focussing on the role of representation practices. A common approach to studying sacred space and atmospheres is to describe significant architectural qualities and their relation to the experience and use of a building. While this approach informs my own research, the present study focusses instead on the design process, primarily because it is inseparable from – and largely determines – the qualities of the built result. The design of buildings that evoke a certain experience depends on the architect’s ability to project themselves imaginatively into the future building and site. In architectural projects, this projection is accomplished by representational practices. How are atmospheres that express transcendence drawn, modelled, imagined, communicated, and translated into a built work? The research will examine the design process of three buildings – the Sogn Benedetg chapel, the Bruder Klaus chapel, and the Kolumba museum – and Zumthor’s teaching about representation both at the Academy of Architecture in Mendrisio, where he taught from 1996 to 2007, and in the spring 1999 studio “The House Without a Form,” which he taught at the Harvard GSD. The research is situated at the intersection of four distinct yet overlapping scholarly discourses: (1) sacred space in Catholic theology and (2) in religious studies and architecture, (3) architectural atmospheres and phenomenology, and (4) architectural representation practices. 

 

Supervisor Dr. Federica Goffi, Professor, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Co-Supervisor Dr. Stephen Fai, Professor, Director CIMS, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Bert Daelemans, Professor, Faculty of Theology, Department of Dogmatic and Fundamental Theology, Comillas Pontifical University
Advisor: Dr. Philip Ursprung, Professor, History of Art and Architecture (GTA), ETH Zurich

MIQUEL REINA ORTIZ is a Ph.D. Candidate in Architecture (2015-present) at the Azrieli School of Architecture and Urbanism (ASAU) at Carleton University. His research concerns the relationship between different scales of intervention within the context of the Historic City. He has been a Contract Instructor and a Teaching Assistant (2015-2020) in heritage conservation, site and building documentation, urbanism and design studio at the ASAU. He collaborates with the Carleton Immersive Media Studio (CIMS) in the development of new digital workflows applied to heritage conservation. He has participated in international field works and co-authored articles on topics related to digital heritage documentation. He is the Canadian representative of the ICOMOS Emerging Professional Working Group (EPWG) since 2020. He studied architecture at ETSABarcelona (UPC), where he graduated with honours in 2011, and holds a MsC in Restoration and Rehabilitation at ETSABarcelona (UPC). His professional experience in the architecture studio Ravetllat-Ribas Barcelona (2008-2015) focused on adaptive reuse projects, and as a licensed architect, he designed public space, housing, interiors and competitions.

 

The Role of the Detail in the Historic City. The Interdetails of Barcelona Ciutat Vella

 

Classic urban historiography has traditionally understood cities as a whole composed of parts, but this relationship has been challenged over time. Similarly, the concept of integrity has been questioned in the heritage conservation field, from a static to a dynamic and relational approach. Currently, historic cities are understood as a process rather than an object, placing special recognition in the layering and interconnectivity of the natural/cultural, tangible/intangible, and international/local values. Considering both aspects, I reflect on historic cities at three scales: urban, building, and constructive detail. From this multi-scalar approach, the building is understood as an assemblage of components—both tangible and intangible—whose relationship continually changes over time. As such, the heritage building is not considered an isolated object but as a part of a relational space that ranges from the constructive detail to the block, neighbourhood, and city. In this research, I examine Barcelona, the first city named historic, and one of its characteristic tectonic elements, the tile vault, known as volta de maó de pla or Catalan Vault. Ildefons Cerdà (1815-1876), engineer and the first urban theorist, labelled the existing ensemble as ‘historic’ in opposition to his new proposal known as Eixample in 1859, being the first scholar who faced the challenge of defining the Historic City in relation to the extension or new one and considering it as a part of the new whole. The first examples of the volta de maó de pla in Barcelona trace back to the XV century, being a simple, light, fast, economic, versatile and fire-resistant ceramic vaulting technique that inspired a whole construction system known as Construcciò Catalana (Catalan Construction), used extensively in the construction of the city from the pre-industrialization period in 1770 until the recession caused by the Civil War in 1936. The volta de maó de pla has disappeared in Europe, and it is currently only present in the restoration of historic buildings. From these premises, I posit that the “construction and construing” (Frascari 1982) of the Catalan Vault is intimately linked with the Historic City of Barcelona, and consequently plays an essential role in its conservation. This multi-scalar approach highlights the importance of preserving the fine-grain integrity —frequently obliterated— in relation to the urban-grain. The detail tells the story of its making, placing, and dimensioning, but also of its conserving; joining the tangible with the intangible in a cycle that engages the Historic City landscape, calls upon traditional knowledge, and relates to the ritual inhabitation of the site and buildings. This dissertation argues that the most pressing conservation challenge for today’s Historic City’s integrity is to determine how this cycle of renewal can be balanced considering that the whole is contained in the part.

 

Supervisor Dr. Mariana Esponda, Assoc. Prof., Coordinator Architectural Conservation and Sustainability, ASAU, CU
Co-Supervisor Dr. Mario Santana Quintero, Professor, Architectural Conservation and Sustainability Engineering, CU
Co-Supervisor: Dr. Stephen Fai, Professor, Director CIMS, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Federica Goffi, Professor, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU

RYAN STEC is a PhD Candidate in architecture, an artist, designer, educator and producer working in both research and production. Interested in the cross sections of technology, creativity and the built environment, his most recent work is focused on art interventions that redefine how we experience the city around us. His passion for developing cultural discourse through artistic production has guided his heavy involvement in the artist-run culture of Ottawa since 1998.

 

Dissertation Abstract

This research is concerned with the temporary and informal aspects of the spaces of the city and the political potential for design intervention. Drawing on the theoretical work of Bruno Latour and Actor Network Theory it outlines the possibilities for an object-oriented politics for design, that is a theory of politics which includes objects into the realm of action. Sited in the Centretown neighbourhood of Ottawa, this research will combine a counter mapping of the informal boundaries of the city with the design of temporary material interventions exploring the potential action of objects or the making of public things. The concept of a public thing extends the ideas about a pragmatic public as described by John Dewey in The Public and its Problems (1927), where the public can be made tangible and specific through the examination of issues. In this sense objects become public things when they become a node in a network of issues which specify a public. These two elements will form the basis of a prototype called the Action Information System (AIS). An AIS will combine geospatial dimensions of data with temporal dimensions as a new representational tool for both mapping and politics, demonstrating the possibilities for participation in the city and politics by both human and non-human actors.

 

Supervisor: Dr. Federica Goffi, Professor, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Claudio Sgarbi, Adjunct Professor, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Chris Salter, Professor, University Research Chair, Concordia University

CRISTINA URECHE-TRIFU, OAA is a practicing architect and Ph.D. student with a focus on construction and conservation. After completing her architectural training in Romania, Cristina then obtained an M.A. in heritage conservation from Carleton University before starting her PhD studies. In addition to her research, she has also gained significant teaching experience, serving as Teaching Assistant for courses ranging from the basics of heritage conservation and conservation studio, to architectural history and urban planning. She has co-organized a conservation charrette bringing together students from design, conservation and engineering with the industry, and has presented at a number of national and international conferences. In parallel to her academic career, Cristina has been actively involved in the profession, having worked on a large number of conservation projects in and around the Parliamentary Precinct in Ottawa. Combining her passion for practice with her academic career, her research interests range from craftsmanship and materials conservation to studying the intersection between construction and conservation and the way in which conservation principles and theories get transformed during the actual project implementation.

 

Constructing Conservation. The role of decision-making, contracting and legislation in architectural conservation projects

 

This dissertation seeks to examine the process of construing and constructing architectural conservation, tracing the process from inception to final object, and discussing the impact of forcing conservation projects to mould themselves into an increasingly fragmented and prescriptive construction industry. Starting with a brief overview of architecture, construction and conservation history the first part of the research will discuss the relationships between theory and practice and between architecture and conservation and will discuss the framework within which conservation theory and architectural practice currently exist. Outside of the preliminary part which discusses heritage conservation and the architectural profession in more general terms, the remainder of the work will be focused on Eastern Ontario. This area has been chosen as it is home to some of the largest contemporary conservation projects in the country and it is expected that lessons learned and precedents from these projects will then be applied to smaller projects around the country. Documentation regarding public tenders for conservation projects will be analyzed, with respect to both consultant (professional) services and the actual construction part. The information gathered in this way will be supplemented with more specific case-studies from the author’s practice, in order to offer additional insight on aspects that cannot be gleamed and understood sufficiently from reviewing documentation or through interviews. Finally, the findings and implications of the research will be discussed in detail, with a focus on proposing a revised methodology for a more collaborative decision-making and implementation process on conservation projects. As a way to test this methodology, the project of architecture will consist of a heritage charrette which will also serve to expose students to the various stakeholders in the conservation project, including some of the participants that are often missing from discussion on conservation theory and/or practice: the owners, the contractors and the sub-trades.

 

Supervisor: Dr. Mariana Esponda, Assoc. Prof., Coordinator Architectural Conservation and Sustainability, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Stephen Fai, Professor, Director CIMS, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Federica Goffi, Professor, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU

KRISTIN WASHCO is a PhD Candidate at the Azrieli School of Architecture and Urbanism, Carleton University. She has been a Contract Instructor at the school (2019-2021). She received her Master’s in Architectural History + Theory from McGill University in 2019, and her professional degree in Architecture from Virginia Polytechnic Institute in 2012. Kristin is a Registered Architect in New York and spent seven years practicing in New York City before relocating to Canada. Her professional work with NOROOF Architects, DXA Studio and MADERA has won multiple awards, including the AIA Award of Excellence, and has been published in The New York Times, Dwell, and Architectural Digest, among others. As a designer, she believes whole heartedly in the value of beautiful and well-made objects and seeks spaces which engage the senses and support the poetic act of dwelling. Her research interests are centered around the synesthetic experience of architecture, methods of architectural representation, and the translation from page to built work.

 

Supervisor: Dr. Federica Goffi, Professor, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Stephen Fai, Professor, Director CIMS, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Paul Emmons, Professor, Associate Dean for Graduate Studies, WAAC, Virginia Tech

⟶ PhD Students

MARCO IANNI received his professional designation as a member of the Ontario Association of Architects in 2017 while working with Douglas Cardinal. He is enrolled in the PhD program in Architecture at Carleton University while working in the CIMS lab and teaching Design at Algonquin College. Marco graduated from Carleton University’s Architecture program in January 2012 with a Master of Architecture (M.Arch), with a master’s thesis entitled “Uncanny Dynamism: Can Neuroscience Inform our Understanding of the Modern City?” During his studies, he played for the Varsity Men’s Soccer team in 2004 and 2008. His interests extend the confines of architecture. He trains multiple times a week in various Eastern and Southern Asian systems under Sifu William Hearst of the Hearst Academy of Martial Arts.

 

Supervisor: Dr. Federica Goffi, Professor, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU 
Co-Supervisor: Dr. Claudio Sgarbi, Adjunct Professor, ASAU, CU 
Advisor: Dr. Stephen Fai, Professor, Director CIMS, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU

 

YU ZHENG is an Architectural Heritage Conservation Architect who has been engaged in architectural and related cultural heritage conservation for nearly two decades. He received a bachelor’s degree in architecture from the School of Architecture of Tsinghua University in 1999. After three years of residential planning and design, he graduated from the same school in the study of architectural history and conservation theory. He obtained his master’s degree in engineering in 2005 and continued to work in the field of heritage conservation (master planning, surveying and mapping, restoration design, and site technical services). Since 2014, he has been general manager and director of Beijing GuoWenYan Conservation Science and Information Technology Co., Ltd. He applied the various digital recording technologies to the murals and painted sculptures investigating work which closely integrated with heritage buildings. He published The Digital Surveying and Mapping Report on the Mural of Baofan Temple (2018), and the Specification for Digitalized Surveying and Mapping of Wall Painting in Historic Building (2017).

 

Supervisor Dr. Stephen Fai, Professor, Director CIMS, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor Dr. Mario Santana Quintero, Professor, Architectural Conservation and Sustainability Engineering, CU
Advisor: Dr. Maurice Murphy, Professor, Director Virtual Building Lab, Technological University of Dublin
Advisor: Dr. Chang Liu, Professor, Institute of Architectural History and Conservation, School of Architecture, Tsinghua University

DAMIANO AIELLO is an Italian building engineer enrolled in the PhD Program in Architecture at the Azrieli School of Architecture and Urbanism, Carleton University. He is actively involved with Carleton Immersive Media Studio (CIMS), a research lab affiliated with the ASAU focused on advanced digital technologies and hybrid forms of representation.
He received his Master’s Degree in Building Engineering and Architecture from the University of Catania in 2018. During his studies, he was awarded two Erasmus+ scholarships to work in Spain and in Canada. Prior to his admission to the PhD program, Damiano worked for an engineering firm in Italy and gained multiple research fellowships at the University of Catania and Politecnico di Milano to develop Virtual Reality experiences. In his professional work, he collaborated with the University of Catania on the design of the MuRa (Museum of Representation) exhibition and on the digitization and virtualization of Sicilian and Cretan cultural heritage. His research interests are centred around digital surveying techniques, 3D modelling, digitization of cultural heritage and Virtual Reality.


Supervisor: Dr. Stephen Fai, Professor, Director CIMS, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Claudio Sgarbi, Adjunct Professor, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Natalia Escobar, Assistant Professor, ASAU, CU

SERKAN TAYCAN is a PhD student at the Azrieli School of Architecture & Urbanism, Carleton University. He holds a BA (2003) in civil engineering and completed his MA (2014) in Visual Arts at Sabancı University, Istanbul and in Photography at Aalto University, Helsinki. Serkan is a visual artist whose work has been exhibited in various museums and galleries including the Venice Architectural Biennial, MAXXI, MuCEM, and the Istanbul Museum of Modern Art. Between 2015-2018, he taught courses on visual arts in the public realm, and architectural photography. In his PhD research, he focuses on how infrastructural interventions alter water bodies, and their transformative effects on border ecologies.

 

Supervisor: Dr. Ozayr Saloojee, Associate Professor, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Lisa Moffitt, Associate Professor, ASAU, CU  
Advisor: Dr. David Hugill, Assistant Professor, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, CU

 

WARREN BORG is an Architect with experience in Nunavut, Canada. He leverages a depth of Northern construction understanding to deliver projects that balance operational efficiency, building performance, design team coordination, and fiscal realities. Warren has directly coordinated projects for several institutional fields, including health care, justice, education, and social services.
His PhD focus at Carleton University is on the historical impacts of euro-Canadian housing typologies within the social-political landscape of Iqaluit, Nunavut, from 1942-1965. Warren’s passion for architecture has led him to be a role model for emerging design professionals. One of his guiding principles is that “pride of place is sustainable” and holism is essential to creating sustainable environments.

Supervisor Dr. Federica Goffi, Professor, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Co-Supervisor Dr. Omeasoo Wahpasiw, Assistant Professor, Indigenous and Canadian Studies, CU
Advisor Dr. Kelly Crossman, Associate Professor (retired), ASAU, CU

REEM AWAD is a PhD student at the Azrieli School of Architecture and Urbanism, Carleton University. She received her Master of Architecture in 2019 from Carleton University. Before joining Carleton University, Reem worked for five years as an architect at a couple of architecture and engineering construction firms in Palestine, where she obtained her professional degree in Architectural Engineering from An-Najah National University. Since 2018 Reem has been working as a researcher at Carleton Immersive Media Studio (CIMS). During this time, she led two digital documentation projects of UNESCO World Heritage sites in Cyprus and Myanmar. Reem is interested in the notion of temporary as it manifests in the context of architecture and how the temporary can be used as an instrument of power.

Supervisor: Dr. Ozayr Saloojee, Associate Professor, ASAU, CU
Co-Supervisor:  Dr. Stephen Fai, Professor, Director CIMS, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Suzanne Harris-Brandts, Assistant Professor, ASAU, CU

AHMED ELSHERIF is a PhD student at the Azrieli School of Architecture and Urbanism, Carleton University. He holds a BFA (2012) from Alexandria University, Egypt, where he worked afterwards in academia and research at different universities. He received the Erasmus+ grant (2016) for staff training mobility program – United Kingdom, and was awarded the Fulbright scholarship to pursue his MDesSE (2018) at Iowa State University. Prior to joining Carleton University, Ahmed worked as a Teaching Assistant in the United States, while pursuing his MFA and MS Arch at Iowa State University. His research interests span the nexus of architecture history, Critical Theory, and culture. 

Supervisor: Dr. Natalia Escobar, Assistant Professor, ASAU, CU
Advisor:  Dr. Federica Goffi, Professor, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Advisor: Dr. Menna Agha, Assistant Professor, ASAU, CU

SIMONE FALLICA is a PhD student at the Azrieli School of Architecture & Urbanism since 2021. In July 2020 he obtained his civil and environmental engineering license. In March 2020 he completed his master’s degree in Building Construction at the University of Catania with a thesis focused on the virtual reconstruction of a Medieval church destroyed by the 1669 eruption of Mount Etna. Between 2016 and 2017, he received two Erasmus+ grants to carry out two internships in Spain and Canada. In the last years, he collaborated with the Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture of the University of Catania. His research interests are centered on architectural palimpsests, lost historical architecture, cultural heritage digitization and 3D modeling.

 

Supervisor: Dr. Federica Goffi, Professor, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU
Co-supervisor: Dr. Stephen Fai, Professor, Director CIMS, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU

SENA KURÇENLİ KOYUNLU is a Ph.D. student at the Azrieli School of Architecture and Urbanism, Carleton University. She obtained her master’s degree in the Department of Architecture, Restoration Program from Istanbul Technical University in 2022. Sena is a registered urban planner in Turkey and specialized as a heritage planner. Before joining Carleton, Sena had various experiences in the conservation of architectural heritage and was a research team member on archaeological excavations such as Adramytteion Archaeological Excavation and St. Thekla Archaeological Site Survey in Turkey. She specializes in GIS-based models of archaeological sites, and survey, restitution, and restoration of cultural heritage. Her research interests are concentrated on the rural and cultural landscape of Cappadocia, its multileveled settlement features and their conservation planning approaches. As well, it includes the digitization of architectural heritage by focusing on the rock-carved architecture and its relation to topography in Cappadocia, Turkey. 

 

Supervisor: Dr. Stephen Fai, Professor, Director CIMS, Co-Chair PhD Architecture, ASAU, CU

ADILA MEHJEBIN is a PhD student and holds a Master’s degree in urban planning specialized in Housing from the School of Planning and Architecture, New Delhi, India. She is an Architect and Urban planner having more than three years of work experience in micro-macro level design, sustainability, and urban housing in India and Abu Dhabi (UAE). She has developed specialized knowledge and skills in analyzing the physical, social, cultural, economic, and ecological dimensions of urban settlements.

Her Ph.D. research aims to evaluate community resilience to improve housing provision and the quality of life of disaster-affected vulnerable communities in the Indian state of Kerala. She will focus on solutions to build resilient communities through effective spatial planning, regeneration strategies and community consultation.

USHMA THAKRAR is Ph.D. student at the Azrieli School of Architecture and Urbanism. She holds previous degrees from the Architectural Association, Columbia University, and Carleton University. Prior to joining the program, she has held positions at several cultural institutions, including the Canadian Centre for Architecture in Montréal, arc en rêve centre d’architecture in Bordeaux, and the Remai Modern in Saskatoon and has taught at Waterloo University and the Architectural Association. Her research investigates the role of domestic architectural aesthetics in the modernization projects of imperialization and independence in late-colonial India. 

 

Supervisor: Dr. Ozayr Saloojee, Associate Professor, MArch Chair, ASAU, CU

SHARMEEN SAYED DAFEDAR is a PhD student at Carleton Universitys Azrieli School of Architecture and Urbanism. She has previously researched and studied the relation between traditional architecture and living crafts practiced in the city of Srinagar in Kashmir and discusses the same in her 2019 Masters thesis. Her research interests in architecture involve studying the relationships between the urban fabric of cities and the cultural productions brought about by its people in the present day and how it affects the architecture of the region. She is a registered Architect in India and has practiced as an Architect in Mumbai as well as a Designer in New York. She holds a Bachelor in Architecture degree from University of Mumbai (2014) and a Masters of Science in Architecture Studies from MIT (2019). She also indulges her creative side as an artist in intricate drawings and illustrations of heritage buildings. She has been passionate about Architecture represented in works of Science-Fiction and has taught courses on the same in Mumbai. 

michelle corinne liu (they/she) is an artist, writer and PhD student at the Azrieli School of Architecture and Urbanism at Carleton University. They hold a BFA from York University (2014) and an MA in Theory and Criticism from Western University (2020). They are interested in de-professional practices, liberatory education and subversive possibilities in the minor textures of everyday life. They are inspired by abolitionist imaginaries, fugitive infrastructures, oceanic poetics, slow militancies and riotous possibilities towards collective liberation. Their work looks to architecture as a practice of radical study and seeks speculative and tactile approaches to space and politics that are often situationist, improvisatory and unfinished. Their current projects concern labour, time travel and collective practice.