(NOT) ANOTHER TORONTO TOWER
Text by Jerry Hacker
In Toronto, residential towers are used as public, private, and hybrid initiatives to provide innovative construction and financing solutions for affordable housing, but the models tend to privilege traditional capitalist notions of private ownership, mortgage financing, and the nuclear family, which are all evolving.
Increasingly, the results are smaller unit sizes that cost more and a narrow focus of what affects one’s ability to live by affordable means (short and long term) in a city.
Under this guidance, the projects cannot address the myriad of factors that contribute to affordable living in a major urban centre, such as public transit, local neighbourhood economies, growth and change of family size over time, extended family living opportunities, innovative construction methodologies, access to nearby community resources, and minimizing day-to-day operating costs – all of which impact a city dweller’s disposable income.
(Not) Another Toronto Tower questions this methodology, instead searching for a new model where public investments in city infrastructure are coupled with investments in city-building and housing. The proposal merges transit, recreation, public space, housing, prefabrication and embraces the evolution of a typology over time – one that grows as people grow; one that is added to when the time is right; one that is focused on public space and the collective domain; and one that is focused on the curious, unusual, fantastical, and magical meetings between people and the spaces we inhabit.